Prince Tour ★ Rick James Tour ’80 ★ Dirty Mind Tour ★ Controversy Tour ★ 1999 Tour ★ Purple Rain Tour ★ Parade Tour ★ Sign O’ The Times Tour ★ Lovesexy Tour ★ Nude Tour ★ Diamonds And Pearls Tour ★ Act I ★ Act II ★ The Ultimate Live Experience ★ Japan '96 ★ Love 4 One Another Charities Tour ★ Jam Of The Year World Tour ★ New Power Soul Tour ★ New Power Soul Festival Tour ★ Hit N Run Tour 00-01 ★ A Celebration ★ One Nite Alone. All except for DMSR, which produces corrupted video, although the audio is intact.Īs far as I know, there's no support for a f4v file to include low def as well, so if they play, then they're playing HD.Value City Arena at The Jerome Schottenstein Center (OSU)Ĭoncerts West Prod Rep / Venue Advance RepĮd & Ted’s Excellent Lighting Company, Inc. Windows media player gives a warning and asks if you want to continue and then seems to play the files.
It is the first promotional video for a song to feature the full line. The video was shot in Los Angeles, California over two days in October 2003and directed by Sanaa Hamri. The video was included in an enhanced part of the Musicology album (CD version). It's odd that some players will play them if you change the extension but not if you don't. Musicology is a Prince video released for broadcast and to promote the single.
However, older versions of software might not have the necessary codec to play the high def files. Does anyone know when you change the file extension from f4v to flv (I did this and they then play in a standard flv player) whether you automatically lose this HQ quality?Īccording to the flash video specification, file extensions should be ignored by flash players, they look in the file itself to see what the format is.
you may need to install a compatible player. F4V format which is a HQ version of flash FLVs. Lets hope things improve a lot.cos so far its not worth the $.just another hassle I can do without.shame really, I was really looking forward to things this time round, even after the first few days of the site being overloaded. I for one am not pleased.a lot of countries don't have ultra fast broadband and it takes me about 10 minutes just for the damn site to buffer in.let alone try and watch a streaming hi-res video clip.at least last week we could download it (albeit being forced to use other software cos there was no direct download) and watch it once it was finished downloading.that way it was enjoyable to watch.this is just a nightmare and I won't bother.
Shame its only 'streaming'.for the $$ to join I don't think we should be locked in to watch a stop-start stuttery pixelated mess like that.why the hell can't we just download it and watch it offline like 'normal people' - its not as though its a whole concert or anything. E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator then its a HQ version of a crappy quality vid. But of course if the source wasn't that great of quality to begin with. Here is another one of my All time favourite songs EVER May this be a tribute to the never dying PRINCE Using an RC-300 Loop Station and KORG AX3000G guit. I'm kinda thrilled to get good quality versions of a lot of the older stuff 'minus' BET and MTV logos and such. I'm sure there are a lot of fans around the globe who hasn't been able to see many of these videos on any regular basis and are thrilled to see them.Īlso. what would be the point on giving everything all up front.? We got a yearly subscription. If he continues to put new stuff up every week I'm cool.
So far there has been a mix of never before seen and rare vids as well as classic and 'pop' hits up.
Plus over 20 min of Coachella video which had never been seen. things like the 45 min Sacrifice of Victor or the Detroit DMSR performance are treats.( I know I had never seen the DMSR one). every fan has not seen every video or boot leg thats out there. On the other, so far it's not worth the money and I don't feel particularly 'exclusive'Ĭontrary to popular belief. On the one hand, at least they are adding new stuff regularly. At least to back up all the 'exclusive content' claims they made and to help reassure fans who have stumped up the $77. If his intention is to have some kind of 'online vault' then I'm all for it, but I think under the circumstances he should have started of with some 'rarer' gems. Seen it all before.many, many times *yawn*